Christine Blasey Ford

17 September 2018

“So,” the Republicans ask. “Why now?”

Because it works. The democrats have, to paraphrase Gussie Mausheimer in An American Tale, weweased the secwet weapon once again.

What am I talking about? Why, the same secwet weapon that was weweased on Judge Moore! Clarence Thomas! Herman Caine! The unsubstantiated, antiquated claim of some nefarious deed against some imagined victim conjured to life JUST IN THE NICK OF TIME to derail their progress on the political stage.

Why do they to it, even though most sentient beings can see right through it? Because, the way they’ve set up the duck with our society: it tends to bear fruit. That, and I suspect most of their adherents aren’t sentient – but that’s fodder for another session at the keyboard.

Personally, the only shocking thing I encountered in this epoch was to learn that Kavanaugh was still in high school in the early 80s. I guess I’ve finally reached that age where I’m older than many of the political class.

Christine Blasey Ford? Likely paid. Likely not who she presents herself to be. Likely lying. The best she has done in this is expose herself as a shill for the democrats. The worst she will have done is derail the appointment of a good man to the Supreme Court.

Frankly, I think Feinstein should be in prison for contempt of congress for this bit of kabuki theater (and that, I believe, is likely the least of her crimes). But, hey – she learned from similar acts perpetrated by her party leadership, her predecessors, and her peers.


Of secret signalling and the like

13 September 2018

“He used that term because it’s a dog whistle to the extreme right.” – Hillary “Dynastic Immunity” Clinton

Can we please get this hag off of the world stage? Please? Isn’t there anyone in the wings with a shepherd’s crook long enough to pull this beast out of view and out of ear-shot? Anyone? Please? Just hook her off, give her one of those fancy one-sleeved jackets, and pack her off into a comfortable cell somewhere. No? Maybe? Anyone?


Ok, then. Let’s think about the terms the left uses to describe the right. Deplorable. Radical. How about this term “dog whistle”? Do you think the left thinks very highly of the right? Of course not! We’re all just dogs waiting around for someone to puff into the whistles that motivate us. Like, say, AntiFa.

Oh! Wait a minute! AntiFa isn’t an organization associated with the right, is it. I must have meant Black Lives Matter. Doh! Again, not a group associated with the right. Resist? Nope. Another leftist organization.


Well, maybe its because their signalling is so overt! Yeah, that’s it. Maxine Waters calling for violence couldn’t be characterized as a coded “dog whistle message”, could it. I get it now. The right MUST be “dog whistling” because one of these geniuses on the left have to INTERPRET the signal so we can all “hear” it.

That’s gotta be it!

Lets talk about the word “deplorable”. How about we couple that with “behavior”. Oh! We get “deplorable behavior”! Things like leaving tons of trash behind after a poorly attended “demonstration” or “protest” in the public square. Like setting up camps and trashing city streets. Things like blocking roads, and harassing business owners or their patrons. Things like showing up to “counter-protest” armed to the teeth and wearing body armor. Or setting a town on fire and looting its businesses while protesting “bigotry” and “racism” – pretty much perpetuating the stereotype that causes certain bigotries and racism. How about attacking – PHYSICALLY attacking – people over what they’re wearing, or where they’re going, or what they believe, or who they voted for?

These are all textbook examples of deplorable behavior.

And who are these bad actors from whose activities I parallels to the definition of “deplorable”? People on the right? Wrong again! The same groups: AntiFa, RESIST, BLM, the Occupy crowd (are they still a thing?), and just about every other left-wing nut-job wandering our streets with violence on their minds.

Oh, and another favorite of the talking heads on the left: referring to Trump as “a low IQ individual”. This coming from some sap-sucking, quacking head on a news show who, if s/he’s lucky, may be worth a bit of money south of a million (after all: s/he’s not an elected DNC politician. THAT’S where the millions lay…), with precisely the genius level IQ required to parrot DNC talking points in front of a camera. Low IQ. I guess it doesn’t take much intelligence these days to become a billionaire. Twice.

I wish I was that stupid.

And, Hillary referring to ANYONE as a dog? Has she caught a glimpse of herself in a mirror during this century? Or the last, even? Bitch: yo is uuuuuug-lee. Thou shouldst not cast stones…


Me, Too, Dave, er, Chris-whatever. Me, too…

15 August 2018

“You know, I look at the platform of a living wage and health care for all. That’s called civilized society. I don’t even know how that became socialism or Republican or Democrat. Let’s be a civilized society. … I’m not sure I even know what socialism is.” — Dave “Christine” Hallquist

And from that, I’m pretty sure I can agree with you! Finally! after all this time, I can agree with a liberal. Yes, Dave Christine: you don’t know what socialism is.


A Study In Contrasts or Hypocrisy

2 August 2018

On one hand we have:

“I’m very worried that the hostility whipped up by Trump and some in conservative media will result in somebody getting hurt. We should not treat our fellow Americans this way.” —CNN’s Jim Acosta

And on the other…

“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them! And you tell them that they are not welcome, anymore, anywhere.” —Maxine Waters

Oh, wait: It’s the same left hand…

It is left as an exercise for the reader to determine who is a hypocrite, and who is stirring up violence against those they disagree with.


Um, to shoot back?

25 July 2018

Why does anyone in this city need to have a gun at all?” —Toronto Mayor John Tory


So Mayor Tory – mayor in a city within one of the left’s darlings; one of their “evolved” countries which have abolished its citizenry’s right to bear arms – has experienced yet another failure of their ability to keep guns off the streets, and laments why anyone in the city needs a gun.

Well, Johnny boy! I can give you 15 reasons. The two killed and the 13 injured in this recent failure of your policies. How about the 14 reasons in Quebec City? The 11 reasons in Laroche? (That was a school shooting, too – haven’t we been told time and again by the MSN that those only happen in the US?) How about the eight reasons in Edmonton? Or the five reasons in Moncton? Or the three reasons in Claresholm? Or the eight in Shedden, or the 20 at Dawson College, or the four in Mayerthorpe, or the four in Grimsby, or…. Well, you get the drift. There are plenty of reasons to be able to defend oneself. And there are countless firearms remaining in your fair city. You simply cannot acknowledge their existence as it is wholly contrary to your world view.

You see, John-boy, only law-abiding citizens abide by the law. Hence the term. Criminals, on the other hand, do NOT abide by the law. Again: hence the term. Now, take an asinine law designed to take the guns away from criminals by taking them away from everyone, and… I’m sure most see what’s coming next. Maybe not you, so much, but most understand that you’ve simply eliminated the law-abiding citizen’s ability to defend themselves from those who DON’T abide by the law and are still armed. With guns. Guns you’ve made illegal. All that you and your ilk have managed to do is violate the basic human right to self defense for those who you allegedly serve. And that right, Juan, is the reason why somebody in your city would need a gun. The right to defend their own life. Because when seconds count, the RCMP and OPP are only minutes away. And, as evidenced by Parkland earlier this year, the police may be no help when they arrive…


A Mud Bug Slings Mud

16 July 2018

“Question for President Trump as he meets Putin: Do you know which team you play for?” —Hillary Clinton

Why, Hillary: he’s playing for OUR team. And we’re very, very clear whose team he’s playing for. We’re also very, very clear who is NOT playing on our team. We’re very clear who is playing as a “free agent” interested only in fulfilling their avaricious greed and lust for power. We’re keenly aware of those who play far outside of the laws set for our team, but, somehow, escape retribution – or even scrutiny!

Yes, Hillary. Thanks for the reminder.


Of All The Hypocrites, Elected Democrats Take The Cake

12 July 2018

“President Trump should not meet with President Putin alone. … The president needs to remember that, as Commander-in-Chief, his duty is to protect the American people from foreign threats, not to sell out our democracy to Putin.” —(alleged) Senator Chuck Schumer

Really? REALLY? You’ll go there, you jackass?! Have you forgotten this, Chuckie?

“This is my last election … After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama to Medvedev, March 2012

So, Chuckster, just who shouldn’t have been left alone when meeting with the Russians? Hmmm? It certainly isn’t Trump…


DNC: What Exactly DO You Stand For?

6 July 2018

After the U.S. Department of Labor released the latest jobs and unemployment numbers, DNC Chair and former Labor Secretary Tom Perez made the following statement:

“With slow wage growth, rising health care premiums, and skyrocketing gas prices across the country, Donald Trump’s reckless policies are hurting millions of hardworking families. Trump and Republicans in Congress have been so determined to undermine workers that they held a Supreme Court seat hostage for nearly a year in order to nominate an aggressively anti-union justice, who became the deciding vote in last week’s disgraceful decision in the Janus case.


“This is all part of the Republican playbook. For decades, Republicans and their wealthy corporate allies have been chipping away at workers’ rights, weakening unions, and depressing wages – all while giving massive tax cuts to the top 1%. And Janus is their most dangerous attack yet.

“Trump and Republicans in Congress are trying to build a winner-take-all economy that enriches their wealthy friends and saddles working families with the bill. Democrats want to create good-paying jobs and build an economy that works for everyone. And we will continue to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with workers and with our brothers and sisters in the labor movement as they fight for the wages, benefits, and livelihood they deserve.”

So… Faster wage growth, but fewer employed is what they want? And Unions, of course. They LOVE Unions – but, wait: don’t Unions hinder faster wage growth by requiring the same for all?

And what, exactly, are “workers’ rights”? Don’t “workers” enjoy the same rights that every other citizen in the US enjoy?

And gas prices…

When Øbama was in office, their rallying cry was the government had no impact on fuel prices; that it was all controlled by OPEC. Now they appear to believe the government DOES have an impact. Huh. I can understand that, though. Oddly, I saw gas prices go up when Øbama did things like… Oh, I don’t know… preclude any new drilling on US soil or waters, decline to allow the Kesytone XL pipeline to go through, etc.; and I saw them go down when Trump announced an end to Øbama’s war on energy, when he negotiated with certain of the OPEC nations, etc. So I guess they finally figured out that the government DOES have an impact on fuel prices. Great! Learning!

And just who are these downtrodden “workers” who have fewer rights than those who aren’t “workers”? Wait! I know! The “workers” are those who actually have jobs and earn a living, but don’t have the right to the entirety of their wages! But who is oppressing these “workers”? Who are the evil bastards stealing their hard-earned pay? Ah! It’s the government. But how does the government oppress these “workers”? Why, by giving their money away to those who DON’T work while withholding the benefits they freely give away to those who aren’t “workers” from those who earn the benefits for them. By spending the “workers” hard-earned money on ridiculous “scientific studies” which ultimately only benefit those performing the studies. Or paying other countries to hate us (my favorite!). All things the DNC also likes.

And how come all of these DNC politicians always bemoan the millionaires? I mean: they’re ALL millionaires. Why do they hate themselves so?

I guess I have to say it: either the DNC is a front for socialists who cannot STAND to have the people of the US succeed, or I smell bullshit.

Wait! It’s both.


Supreme Hypocrisy On Display

3 July 2018

“…action on any Supreme Court nominee should wait until after the American people vote in November…” – many (D) politicians

Why? Didn’t the American People speak loudly enough for you in 2016? And how come the (D)s are suddenly taking this position when, just a couple of years ago, they were railing against the blocking of an Øbama appointee just prior to the PRESIDENTIAL election?! Odd.

While the delay of such appointments prior to a presidential election may have been standard practice for some time: I’m sorry, (D)s: there is no such practice, tradition, or precedence around midterm elections. The appointment is Trump’s to make. But no worries: when you are routed in the midterm elections, you can continue to obstruct Trump from executing all of his Constitutional privileges and duties – including the appointment of federal judges – just as you have been since the day he took office. It is simply my hope that there will be far fewer of you in office at that time…


Nazis? Anyone? Bueller?

22 June 2018

“This policy of family separation reminds us of the cattle cars of Nazi Germany.” —Richard Blumenthal

Ok. Then why did you Democrats put the policies in place under Billie-Jeff Clinton?! Does this make Clinton Hitler?