Archive for the ‘2nd Amendment’ Category

Piers Morgan: Get the @$%& Out

24 January 2013

OK. I can’t stand it anymore. I’m back. Some of you knew it would come to this, and that I couldn’t keep my big mouth shut long.

I have a question.

Where does Piers Morgan – or, better: Piers Stefan O’Meara – get off? Really. The dolt hasn’t seen fit to become a citizen, yet believes he’s entitled to a voice in the US? This parasite suckles from the teet of our economy, and spews leftist garbage better than Øbama himself. What right does this bastard have trying to set policy or opinion in the US? Like Bono of U2:  absolutely none. I really don’t understand his employment by CNN, either – it’s not like there is any shortage of left-spewing socialistic personages here in the States. (Well, OK. Maybe there is a shortage of left-spewing socialistic personages who’d actually rather “work” for a living than live on the dole or the government payroll. But I repeat myself…)

I just finished viewing one of Morgan’s gun control rants in which he so daintily dismisses the gun problem in Mexico – a country with absolute gun control laws – as “a special case”. No, dipshit. It is clearly not a special case. Mexico, like every other patch of dry land in the world, as well as several oceans,  has these things called “criminals”. Criminals are, notably, people who are known for not  following the law – and most of these are not very particular about which laws they break. That the criminals in Mexico, by and large, also ignore drug trafficking laws is not a special case, but further demonstration of the point. Too, consider this: would Mexico’s drug cartels be so hugely powerful if the law-abiding Mexicans had the means to push them back? Alas, though related to the discussion here, that is another subject.

Let us talk a wee bit about “gun violence” in your beloved Britain, shall we? Can we agree that  like Mexico, Britain also has absolute gun control laws? Can we also agree that, unlike Mexico, in your glowing example – Britain –  there is no “special cause” such as a massive drug trafficking-based economy?  Without this “special cause”, there were still 7,006 firearm related offenses in just England and Wales, according to The Home Office, during 2010/11. So clearly, Piers, guns control laws work, right? Clearly not. You see only 7,006 reported offenses, and crow. I see 7,006 bits of discovered, exposed proof that your premise is fundamentally flawed. I see 7,006 demonstrations that criminals, by definition,  don’t give a rats bahookie about gun control laws. And, as a statistician,  I see far, far more than 7,006 since there are always large numbers of crimes that  go unreported, and an even larger number that go undetected. 

And the problem with “gun violence”, as you like to call it, isn’t the law-abiding gun owners. These are the people stripped of their right to meet force with equal force by misguided “gun free” laws – even that bastard at Fort Hood was safe in the knowledge that solders are not allowed to carry on base. I posit that the vast majority of the incidents bemoaned by the gun control zealots – particularly those in which the shooter survived and was arrested – likely wouldn’t have happened at all if those perpetrating them had an inkling that they’d be met with equal force. Think about it, genius: the huge majority of these incidents occurred in places were law-abiding folks are not allowed to be armed. It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to see the connection.

Piers, if you’re so enamored with your British home and their gun control, why don’t you just return there?! Doing so, you have no worries regarding the second amendment –  what it was intended for, and your perceived problems with it – and, in my opinion, you’ll make the US a better place.

-Pateratic

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

22 October 2012

As we draw up to the 2012 presidential election, that famous “hot mic” gaffe of Øbama – the one that exposed him for the traitor he is – comes to mind. What, precisely, is it that Øbama felt he’d need more flexibility to do with a country that, until very recently was (and quite possibly still is) our sworn enemy? What is it Øbama wishes to do for Russia when he no longer has to worry about voter backlash?

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

And who else is the Appeaser In Chief looking to exercise this new flexibility with? I have a few ideas. How about Iran and Al Qaeda? After all, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” And what’s the best way to make sure the future doesn’t belong to someone, I ask? I think it is via the same means his friends in Al Qaeda are so adept at employing. Imagine all the slanderers of the prophet they could ensure won’t own the future if Ahmadinejad is successful in achieving his nuclear goal? And the delivery vehicle Uncle Joe ensures us they don’t have? Proven a fool, again, Joe. A suitcase and a willing suicide bomber is all they need – and they seem to have no shortage of either

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

Chilling to think about, isn’t it? Perhaps he’ll have more flexibility to remove our ability to defend ourselves if he doesn’t  face any reprisals? How about more flexibility to prosecute that raging battle between him and Christianity? You know: the one regarding his signature legislation obviating the 1st Amendment rights of religious organizations and the conscience rights of religious health care providers? More flexibility to cram more socialist laws down our throats without any threat to his re-election chances?

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

-Pateratic

Too much

22 June 2012

Pelosi’s Bonnie to Holder’s Clyde…

Nan again. Unbelievably, inexplicably, San Fran Nan has come out to say that the Republicans in Congress are after Holder to get him out of play. By what motivation would they be doing this, you ask? Well, in her twisted version of reality, the Republicans believe that, by eliminating Holder, there will be no opposition to their evil, sordid plans to get dead people and illegal aliens off the voting roles!

Those absolute bastards!

Again, in Nan’s world, it’s perfectly fine for the DNC to require photo ID in order to attend their convention – after all: you don’t want any of those sneaky conservatives slipping in! You even have to show photo ID to attend a Moochelle Øbama book signing. But to ensure that a person at the polls is legally qualified to cast a vote? My God, man! What are you suggesting?! Those evil REPUBLICANS are marginalizing minorities! (Well, at least we hope that illegal voters are in the minority…). Those evil,  uniform-wearing, baton-swinging REPUBLICANS at the polls… keeping minorities aw… Wait a minute. Those weren’t REPUBLICANS. And they weren’t turning away minorities  under threat of violence! They were “Holder’s people” – the New Black Panthers! And they were turning away CRACKERS and WHITE DEVILS under threat of violence; clearly not minorities. Huh. How could Nan have gotten that so backwards?

Nan, Nan, Nan…

And it wasn’t the Republicans who implemented the botched Fast & Furious scheme to justify another foray into gun control – a scheme that was implicated in the confirmed deaths of at least one Border Patrol Officer, at least one Customs Enforcement Agent, and in the deaths of countless numbers of Mexican citizens; no: it was Holder’s DOJ that implemented this scheme. Notably, Holder is clearly not a Republican.

Now, with Øbama’s Nixonesque implementation of Executive Privilege, it is clear that he, himself – The Øne – had a hand in the scheme – the criminal scheme – to create justification for the claim that the firearms being used by the Mexican cartels were being sourced in the US. And, notably, Øbama is the absolute antithesis of a Republican.

Personally, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to find Hillary Clinton involved in this scheme up to her droopy eyeballs, either. Lord knows she parroted that “the majority of the guns come from the US” myth at every opportunity. And the Lord knows equally that she’s not good at taking direction – particularly from her  inferiors. Inferiors such as Øbama… And, too, she is not a Republican.

(By the way, Calderón, I don’t believe for a minute that the Mexican Government was not complicit in Fast & Furious. It’s “covert” goal of justifying ever greater infringement of OUR – not YOUR – 2nd amendment rights is too clean of a match for your stated intentions to have been so conveniently coincidental…)

Huh! So where in the frenetic whirlwind that must serve as your mental processes does this come from, Nan? Is it based on the expectation that the majority of the American (legal) voting public has reached that mainstream media-induced state of inattentiveness, apathy, and idiocy that they can’t see through your fantastic talking points? Or is it your belief that you’ve pushed the fabric of our society far enough to the left that it doesn’t really matter; that there is now a majority of (legal) voters so dependent on the government that you can’t lose anyway?

And what of the people of San Francisco? I know that Cah-lee-fone-nya is pretty much existing in a fictional reality all of their own; more aligned with some strange (and, notably: failing) socialist utopia than with these United States – but aren’t they embarrassed to be represented by the likes of you? Don’t even socialist utopias have some minimal standards for intelligence, credibility, and integrity? I know I’m constantly embarrassed by the walking DNC talking points that represent my area – and am equally concerned that any sentient being would actually vote for them – but the majority of the folk in my nearest, largest population centers aren’t really sentient. Typically, they’re drugged-out, uneducated, unemployed,  multigenerational welfare recipients, so I guess I’m not that surprised that these lunatics keep getting voted in. Pure Michigan, that…

In any case, Nan, thanks for playing. Unfortunately, your entry has failed to gain you the prize…

On another note, we didn’t miss the vote that will jack up our energy costs – you know: the one you enviro-nazis had around coal-fired generation plants? You “Republicans” who defected on it and all you good Democrats: we know where you stand. When this hidden tax starts hitting us in the pocket books – and it will hit them hard – we’ll be sure to remember you all and, hopefully, change where you stand to the unemployment line.

-Pateratic


Who Will Protect Us?

3 May 2012

The Armed Citizen. Our Protector.

Reading such quotes from the founding fathers as:

“No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
Thomas Jefferson (1776)

“The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation … forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” — James Madison (1788)

“We established however some, although not all its [self-government] important principles . The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; …that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.”
Thomas Jefferson (1824)

How can anyone, with a straight face, assert that the intention of the 2nd amendment could be anything other than, specifically:

“…being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” — The 2nd Amendment To The Constitution of The United States.

I can’t fathom it. But, to all who would have no guns in the hands of the citizenry, I would confidently bet that you would live to regret your position in the event it ever came to pass. It is abundantly clear, in this current political climate, that all that stands between you keeping your life and possessions and those same being owned or taken away by your government is that they cannot stand long against the army which is the armed US citizenry.

I pray that you never come to realize this change of heart via those means, but, at the same time, I also pray that you come to that change of heart through  rational means…

-Pateratic

Murdering Racists…

29 March 2012

A sad, sad commentary on racism

I was not going to comment on the current situation in Sanford, Florida. To be true, I was far too disgusted by the media’s response to it (no surprise there). I was far too disgusted with the knee-jerk attempt to immediately portray the dead youth as a victim of a heinous, racially-motivated, Republican-fueled hate crime.

As I sat being disgusted by this coverage, my mind couldn’t help going back a few years to an incident in Knoxville, TN. You recall the incident? Probably not. It received absolutely minimal coverage at the time. Let me refresh your memory:

A young couple, university students with bright futures ahead of them, went out on a date. They were carjacked, kidnapped, raped and tortured by four individuals. The torture, while alive, is beyond comprehension. They were beaten. The male was repeatedly sodomized while the female was forced to watch. The kidnappers then cut his penis off – while, again, he was alive and his girlfriend watched. They then dumped him on some railroad tracks, and set him afire. Sick bastards.

To cap their evening off, they repeatedly and variously gang-raped the female, cut her breast off, poured bleach down her throat – again, she was alive during all of this – and, finally and probably mercifully dismembered her and set her remains on fire.

Bright futures extinguished by four sick bastards who clearly do not deserve the lives within them.

Could you imagine this? Could you imagine enduring something like this? What kind of sick minds would do such an act?!

And not a peep from the press. Compare this with our current “victim” who allegedly beat the crap out of someone and got shot for his efforts – whether or not Zimmerman was justified in approaching him is not the point. This young man, according to recent accounts, broke Zimmerman’s nose and was engaged in smashing his head into the pavement when he was shot. Kind of puts the whole “who’s the victim” question into a new light, doesn’t it.

So, why no press of the former? Why no outrage from the jacksons, the sharptons, the farrakhans of the world? Why no egregious tweets from the likes of spike lee, or special investigations from the government? Because the victims were white, and the sick bastards who perpetrated this inhuman, ghastly crime were black. That’s why. At least that is the rationale of the press (www.youtube.com/watch?v=btdya9uOA8Q).

We, the People may be post-racial. But the racist whores which are the  jacksons, the sharptons, the farrakhans, the Øbamas of the world; the race-baiting media – they’ll never get beyond it. Not so long as there is power to be had from it; money to be made from it. They’ll never let it go.

Again: if you buy a newspaper – if you watch the evening news, you are providing aid and comfort to the enemies of this country.

Pateratic

About face!

27 February 2012

Facing the wrong way...

So, the highly creative folks living south of the US border have erected a billboard which letters are made from crushed weapons. This piece of propaganda faces the US and, ostensibly, is a malediction to us for pumping “90% of all weapons found in Mexico” across their border. This number has long been proven farcical, but the Mexican government and our Moron In Chief cling to it in a manner similar to the way in which GØre and his cult of earth worshipers cling to their GlØbal Warming Climate Change statistics.

In light of this fallacy, and with Fast and Furious (that masterful [snicker] attempt by the Øbama administration to move GeØrge SØrØs’ anti-2nd Amendment agenda forward by demonizing the firearms trade in the US by fulfilling their fabricated statistics) fresh in our memories, I submit that the sign is facing in the wrong direction. It should face south, to Mexico as an announcement to their murderous cartels and stupid government that there will be no more weapons freely supplied to them by the traitorous BATFE. Yes, “the jig is up.” You’ve been found out, and now we, the people, are aware and watching.

So, Felipe, get a crane that is in working condition, pick that piece of crap up and spin it around. Morons.

-Pateratic

Agreed on one point, but it begs a question…

15 January 2012

911 timing: minutes. 1911 timing: seconds.

“I don’t quarrel with anyone who wants to exercise their Constitutional right to legally own a gun,” [Detroit] Police Chief Ralph Godbee said. “Nor do I have any quarrel with anybody that exercises their Constitutional right to carry a gun. But is this the best mix? Is legality really the question we need to raise right now? From a practical standpoint, are there too many guns in the city of Detroit? My answer is ‘yes.'”

And I agree that there are too many handguns on the streets of most major US cities. Where we fundamentally differ is where I draw the line defining “too many” and where most politicians and law enforcement personnel draw that line.

To me, in a room full of people carrying firearms, the “one too many” is that person who would use the firearm they are carrying to commit a crime. All too often, our government sees the “too many” as those who are not in law enforcement.

There are several glaring fallacies in the platform of those who would limit your right to keep and bear firearms in the interest of “the public good”. First is that laws to eliminate or limit firearm ownership do not constrain those who do not have any respect for the law. I’ll offer that these are the problem in the first place! Unless some magical process was developed to cause every firearm on the planet to magically vanish; to cause charcoal, sulfur, and potassium nitrate to become noncombustible, and to prevent bored out steel rods, pins, and springs from being combined into a basic percussion fired weapon, those who wish to pursue their use will always find a way. But, even if this magic were to be accomplished, the criminal element will always seek the upper hand. After this hypothetical gun control magic must necessarily come similar archery control, knife control, heavy object control…

Next is the ludicrous posturing that it is the police’s job to protect you – call 911. To paraphrase one of the fools on the hill, have someone tell you you should call 911  when you have a 200 pound man standing over you telling you to submit. “Could you hold on a sec? I’m dialing 911…”

Let me be clear: the best manner of gun control is that which comes with regular practice. We have laws on the books regarding crimes involving firearms. Enforce those; make them a deterrent rather than a joke. Relief by calling upon 911 can take minutes –  actually, hours in Detroit. Relief by calling upon a practiced and handy 1911, however, is immediate.

-Pateratic