Archive for the ‘Zealots’ Category

Hypocrisy vs. Compassion: Planned Parenthood Exposed

11 November 2013

I cannot say it better than this gentleman did: If abortion is only 3% of Planned Parenthood’s business…then how do you explain this? 

-Pateratic

Piers Morgan: Get the @$%& Out

24 January 2013

OK. I can’t stand it anymore. I’m back. Some of you knew it would come to this, and that I couldn’t keep my big mouth shut long.

I have a question.

Where does Piers Morgan – or, better: Piers Stefan O’Meara – get off? Really. The dolt hasn’t seen fit to become a citizen, yet believes he’s entitled to a voice in the US? This parasite suckles from the teet of our economy, and spews leftist garbage better than Øbama himself. What right does this bastard have trying to set policy or opinion in the US? Like Bono of U2:  absolutely none. I really don’t understand his employment by CNN, either – it’s not like there is any shortage of left-spewing socialistic personages here in the States. (Well, OK. Maybe there is a shortage of left-spewing socialistic personages who’d actually rather “work” for a living than live on the dole or the government payroll. But I repeat myself…)

I just finished viewing one of Morgan’s gun control rants in which he so daintily dismisses the gun problem in Mexico – a country with absolute gun control laws – as “a special case”. No, dipshit. It is clearly not a special case. Mexico, like every other patch of dry land in the world, as well as several oceans,  has these things called “criminals”. Criminals are, notably, people who are known for not  following the law – and most of these are not very particular about which laws they break. That the criminals in Mexico, by and large, also ignore drug trafficking laws is not a special case, but further demonstration of the point. Too, consider this: would Mexico’s drug cartels be so hugely powerful if the law-abiding Mexicans had the means to push them back? Alas, though related to the discussion here, that is another subject.

Let us talk a wee bit about “gun violence” in your beloved Britain, shall we? Can we agree that  like Mexico, Britain also has absolute gun control laws? Can we also agree that, unlike Mexico, in your glowing example – Britain –  there is no “special cause” such as a massive drug trafficking-based economy?  Without this “special cause”, there were still 7,006 firearm related offenses in just England and Wales, according to The Home Office, during 2010/11. So clearly, Piers, guns control laws work, right? Clearly not. You see only 7,006 reported offenses, and crow. I see 7,006 bits of discovered, exposed proof that your premise is fundamentally flawed. I see 7,006 demonstrations that criminals, by definition,  don’t give a rats bahookie about gun control laws. And, as a statistician,  I see far, far more than 7,006 since there are always large numbers of crimes that  go unreported, and an even larger number that go undetected. 

And the problem with “gun violence”, as you like to call it, isn’t the law-abiding gun owners. These are the people stripped of their right to meet force with equal force by misguided “gun free” laws – even that bastard at Fort Hood was safe in the knowledge that solders are not allowed to carry on base. I posit that the vast majority of the incidents bemoaned by the gun control zealots – particularly those in which the shooter survived and was arrested – likely wouldn’t have happened at all if those perpetrating them had an inkling that they’d be met with equal force. Think about it, genius: the huge majority of these incidents occurred in places were law-abiding folks are not allowed to be armed. It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to see the connection.

Piers, if you’re so enamored with your British home and their gun control, why don’t you just return there?! Doing so, you have no worries regarding the second amendment –  what it was intended for, and your perceived problems with it – and, in my opinion, you’ll make the US a better place.

-Pateratic

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

22 October 2012

As we draw up to the 2012 presidential election, that famous “hot mic” gaffe of Øbama – the one that exposed him for the traitor he is – comes to mind. What, precisely, is it that Øbama felt he’d need more flexibility to do with a country that, until very recently was (and quite possibly still is) our sworn enemy? What is it Øbama wishes to do for Russia when he no longer has to worry about voter backlash?

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

And who else is the Appeaser In Chief looking to exercise this new flexibility with? I have a few ideas. How about Iran and Al Qaeda? After all, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” And what’s the best way to make sure the future doesn’t belong to someone, I ask? I think it is via the same means his friends in Al Qaeda are so adept at employing. Imagine all the slanderers of the prophet they could ensure won’t own the future if Ahmadinejad is successful in achieving his nuclear goal? And the delivery vehicle Uncle Joe ensures us they don’t have? Proven a fool, again, Joe. A suitcase and a willing suicide bomber is all they need – and they seem to have no shortage of either

I’ll have a lot more flexibility after the election…

Chilling to think about, isn’t it? Perhaps he’ll have more flexibility to remove our ability to defend ourselves if he doesn’t  face any reprisals? How about more flexibility to prosecute that raging battle between him and Christianity? You know: the one regarding his signature legislation obviating the 1st Amendment rights of religious organizations and the conscience rights of religious health care providers? More flexibility to cram more socialist laws down our throats without any threat to his re-election chances?

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

-Pateratic

Poetic Justice

19 September 2012

Breathe Deep…

Fox News headline: Protester Dies After Inhaling Fumes From Burning American Flag

Ah, sweet! I wish more of these neanderthals would take a deep breath of the burning (and likely Chinese-made…) US Flag as they stage their murderous protests! J. Christopher Stevens? Your death has been avenged by the very flag you served; may you rest in honored peace. Too bad it wasn’t one of the Libyan proponents of the religion of peace that got a lungful – But they all seem to share the same tenets and the same goals – so, weighing this on the same scale of justice the muslims use: any one will do.

I just wonder if he’ll still get his virgins?

-Pateratic

Who is responsible for this?!

9 July 2012
It's interesting to note the unemployment rate begins to increase in February, 2008 - when Øbama announced his candidacy...

Comparison: Unemployment rate from each year from Jan 2000 to present

Well! Now that I’m over my case of Roberts-induced depression, I see that YADNER has come out! And, with it, YAAFOTII.

I know, I know. My work in the manufacturing industry has made a fool for acronyms. Let me help you out, there: Yet Another Disappointing National Employment Report and Yet Another Admonition From Øbama To Ignore It. I’d think, by now, most of you should have been able to guess the acronym. I mean, this has happened once a month since January 2009 – that OTHER day that will live forever in infamy. With each disappointing report, we were admonished by The Øne not to make too much out of it. The same disclaimer is published at the bottom of every month’s report. Why? Because the numbers have consistently been pretty disappointing, and those that offered a glimmer of “hope” turned out to be based more on happenstance than any grand plan involved in actually steering the economy to correct its course.

I hear again and again how Øbama isn’t responsible for this economy, that he inherited it. Really? REALLY?! Take a look at the chart above. The data is the Gummint’s own unemployment  data taken from their very own Department of Labor Statistics. Pretty stark, when you look at it in this context.; the Øbama years vs the eight years of Bush – the last year of which was under a Democrat-controlled congress.  Yes, it’s a stark difference.

Because of this inconvenient truth, Øbama and his administration would rather focus on job creation than on the actual unemployment numbers. He and his minions will crow about the 12 million jobs created since the start of his administration. Remember the “jobs created or saved” mantra? That can’t be used anymore. Why? because the 12 million jobs created figure they like to bandy about is not net of the millions of jobs destroyed; it is gross. Don’t doubt it? Then ask yourself this: why haven’t the unemployment numbers improved? Why is the U6 number, which includes folks who have simply dropped out of the race, so dismal? Why have more people jumped on the disability rolls than at any other time in history?

Back to the chart. All of the red lines – the first that showed the unemployment rate begin to increase, to the group that is soaring so much higher than the remainder of the charted years – coincide with that famously Democratic-controlled congress mentioned above.

So mayber you’re right Maybe Øbama did inherit this economy. But he inherited it from Pelosi and Reid; definitely not from Bush.

-Pateratic

The Constitution Is Dead

28 June 2012

Mourning the Constitution, and damning the supreme cowards…

Well, that’s it, then. The supreme court has sold out the constitution and with it: all of us. Welcome to the USSA. Cancel the election. Emperor Øbama does, in fact, have new clothes.

Instead of assessing Øbamacare against the constitution on its own merits as written, the supreme cowards made the administration’s arguments for them – though again and again, the administration asserted that the individual mandate was not  a tax. In fact, I fail to see how mandating an individual citizen to buy a product can be construed as anything but a tax in the first place! 

This goes against everything the founding fathers stood for. And for all you 99%ers out there high-fiving and clapping each other on the back: you will regret this – just as the Canadian and British citizens have come to regret their version of the same Marxist premise.

Atlas has indeed shrugged today. And the rule of law is dead.

-Pateratic

Too much

22 June 2012

Pelosi’s Bonnie to Holder’s Clyde…

Nan again. Unbelievably, inexplicably, San Fran Nan has come out to say that the Republicans in Congress are after Holder to get him out of play. By what motivation would they be doing this, you ask? Well, in her twisted version of reality, the Republicans believe that, by eliminating Holder, there will be no opposition to their evil, sordid plans to get dead people and illegal aliens off the voting roles!

Those absolute bastards!

Again, in Nan’s world, it’s perfectly fine for the DNC to require photo ID in order to attend their convention – after all: you don’t want any of those sneaky conservatives slipping in! You even have to show photo ID to attend a Moochelle Øbama book signing. But to ensure that a person at the polls is legally qualified to cast a vote? My God, man! What are you suggesting?! Those evil REPUBLICANS are marginalizing minorities! (Well, at least we hope that illegal voters are in the minority…). Those evil,  uniform-wearing, baton-swinging REPUBLICANS at the polls… keeping minorities aw… Wait a minute. Those weren’t REPUBLICANS. And they weren’t turning away minorities  under threat of violence! They were “Holder’s people” – the New Black Panthers! And they were turning away CRACKERS and WHITE DEVILS under threat of violence; clearly not minorities. Huh. How could Nan have gotten that so backwards?

Nan, Nan, Nan…

And it wasn’t the Republicans who implemented the botched Fast & Furious scheme to justify another foray into gun control – a scheme that was implicated in the confirmed deaths of at least one Border Patrol Officer, at least one Customs Enforcement Agent, and in the deaths of countless numbers of Mexican citizens; no: it was Holder’s DOJ that implemented this scheme. Notably, Holder is clearly not a Republican.

Now, with Øbama’s Nixonesque implementation of Executive Privilege, it is clear that he, himself – The Øne – had a hand in the scheme – the criminal scheme – to create justification for the claim that the firearms being used by the Mexican cartels were being sourced in the US. And, notably, Øbama is the absolute antithesis of a Republican.

Personally, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to find Hillary Clinton involved in this scheme up to her droopy eyeballs, either. Lord knows she parroted that “the majority of the guns come from the US” myth at every opportunity. And the Lord knows equally that she’s not good at taking direction – particularly from her  inferiors. Inferiors such as Øbama… And, too, she is not a Republican.

(By the way, Calderón, I don’t believe for a minute that the Mexican Government was not complicit in Fast & Furious. It’s “covert” goal of justifying ever greater infringement of OUR – not YOUR – 2nd amendment rights is too clean of a match for your stated intentions to have been so conveniently coincidental…)

Huh! So where in the frenetic whirlwind that must serve as your mental processes does this come from, Nan? Is it based on the expectation that the majority of the American (legal) voting public has reached that mainstream media-induced state of inattentiveness, apathy, and idiocy that they can’t see through your fantastic talking points? Or is it your belief that you’ve pushed the fabric of our society far enough to the left that it doesn’t really matter; that there is now a majority of (legal) voters so dependent on the government that you can’t lose anyway?

And what of the people of San Francisco? I know that Cah-lee-fone-nya is pretty much existing in a fictional reality all of their own; more aligned with some strange (and, notably: failing) socialist utopia than with these United States – but aren’t they embarrassed to be represented by the likes of you? Don’t even socialist utopias have some minimal standards for intelligence, credibility, and integrity? I know I’m constantly embarrassed by the walking DNC talking points that represent my area – and am equally concerned that any sentient being would actually vote for them – but the majority of the folk in my nearest, largest population centers aren’t really sentient. Typically, they’re drugged-out, uneducated, unemployed,  multigenerational welfare recipients, so I guess I’m not that surprised that these lunatics keep getting voted in. Pure Michigan, that…

In any case, Nan, thanks for playing. Unfortunately, your entry has failed to gain you the prize…

On another note, we didn’t miss the vote that will jack up our energy costs – you know: the one you enviro-nazis had around coal-fired generation plants? You “Republicans” who defected on it and all you good Democrats: we know where you stand. When this hidden tax starts hitting us in the pocket books – and it will hit them hard – we’ll be sure to remember you all and, hopefully, change where you stand to the unemployment line.

-Pateratic


The Masquerade

7 May 2012

The Bullshitvik leads the charge…

Lifted wholesale from The Patriot Post:

“Nearly 1,000 protesters were arrested in New York between Sept. 18 and Oct. 15. Police collected information on each arrestee’s name, age, sex, criminal charge, home address and — in most cases — race. The median value of the homes of the arrestees was $305,000 — a far higher number than the $185,400 median value of owner-occupied homes of the rest of us. Ninety-five of the arrestees lived in homes valued at more than $500,000. Those who rented paid a median rent of $1,850 per month. Of the 984 protesters arrested, at least 797 are white. One Occupy Wall Street protester arrested — presumably, if you listen to the mainstream media, penniless and from a blue-collar family — lived in an $850,000 home in the nation’s capital. ” –economist Walter E. Williams

As many have long suspected, the “Øccupy” crowd is clearly not who they would have you believe they are. These people are not the poor, decrepit victims of a heartless, capitalist society, but wealthy socialist tyrants who wish to have more power over your lives; more ability to take from you for the “good of others”. And, as history has demonstrated time and again, those “others” will not be those who the socialists claim to to be helping, but those socialists themselves.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, elections clearly do have repercussions. It is my sincere hope that the yet unfelt repercussion of the 2008 election will not be the destruction for all time of The United States of America as the last remaining bastion of freedom.

-Pateratic

Conflicting views

7 March 2012

To truly appreciate a book, reading is fundamental...

Contrast this:

“The U.S. military should distribute copies of the Quran in Arabic and other local languages to any and all Afghan civilians who want them. …  Americans, who come from a country awash in books, simply don’t realize how important books (especially ‘the book’ for Afghanistan’s Muslims) are to a people that has very few of them.” —Richard Miniter, The Daily Beast

with this:

“Afghanistan Literacy Rate: 28.1%” —CIA, The Word Fact Book

There’s a reason Afghans have very few books and it is very similar to the reason primitive man had so few books: aside from tinder and personal hygiene, three of four have no idea what to do with them (and muslims as a whole prefer the left hand for those things hygienic, anyway) .

Now do you understand how ridiculous you idiots on the left sound to most rational people? First, why should we provide ANYTHING AT ALL to the Afghan people, the most of which absolutely hate us? Second, since we do provide things to Afghans in the form of “foreign aid“, using your normal logic and rhetoric: why would the United States Armed Forces distribute anything religious in nature to anyone? Flies in the face of your usual “separation” rants and raves, doesn’t it? I mean, having a government entity distribute religious tracts and all.

I remain firm that liberalism – that uncanny inability to learn from the painful mistakes of myriad societies that have gone before – is a form of mental retardation. Most of you go pretty far in supporting that conviction when you promulgate your opinions.

-Pateratic

Enemies, foreign and domestic

13 September 2011

Enemiesdomestic. What comes to mind when you see those two words together? Yeah, yeah – I know: the usual suspects: Soros, Pelosi, Couric, Reid, Frank, Matthews, Dodd, Edwards, Obama, etc. How about The Sierra Club? Or, perhaps, The United States Humane Society, or The World Wildlife Fund?

Recently, I came across some very, very good news! Oil fields in Texas, thought exhausted, still contain BILLIONS of barrels of oil locked in the shale below. Better, a process called “hydraulic fracturing” could break it free and enable it to be pumped to the surface! Wow! That could certainly put a dent in our “foreign oil addiction,” couldn’t it?  Enter a new domestic enemy: WildEarth Guardians, an organization I’ll bet you’ve never even heard of. Toss in the “sand dune lizard“, and you have a brand new domestic enemy working their destruciton on the US via their favorite weapon: The Environmental Protection Agency, an agency borne of the lie perpetrated against the world regarding the use of DDT – a chemical singly responsible for the elimination of malaria in the US and many nearby regions – a chemical direly needed in foreign lands but, alas, it was maligned by a “study” that suggested it was responsible for birth defects – a study of which the methods and “science” were called into question within the last ten years.

The EPA:The Left’s  Sledgehammer against the constitution.

Note: This was the post I was working on when the WordPress update went so horribly south in May of 2011. Though it shows a publication date of 13 September 2011, please not that it is MONTHS older than that…

-Pateratic